redistribution cygwin1.dll

[Igor Pechtchanski]

On Tue, 13 May 2003, Jim Drash wrote:

> No I am not thinking trademark. Copyright law is based upon contract law.
> So there is legal "detriment" on both sides.  Failure to enforce
> provisions of a contact can make that contract voidible <sp?>.
>
> I am very tied of this debate.  The simple thing is to follow the details
> of the GPL (or whatever licenses applies) regardless of how "silly"
> anyone thinks it is.
>
> It is just so trivial for developers to comply and debates as to why one
> should not have to comply merely waste everyone's time and seem to make
> cgf more mean <rofl>
>
> Jim Drash

Ok, that does it!  I finally figured out the *real* purpose of all these
GPL discussions.  See <http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#GPL>.  So there! ;-)
	Igor
-- 
				http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
      |\      _,,,---,,_		pechtcha@cs.nyu.edu
ZZZzz /,`.-'`'    -.  ;-;;,_		igor@watson.ibm.com
     |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-'		Igor Pechtchanski
    '---''(_/--'  `-'\_) fL	a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-.  Meow!

Knowledge is an unending adventure at the edge of uncertainty.
  -- Leto II


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/